Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Genetic and Morphological Diversity of Tenthredopsis (Tenthredinidae: Symphyta: Hymenoptera) Species: A Case Study in Anatolia

Year 2025, Volume: 46 Issue: 2, 377 - 383, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1608571

Abstract

The genus Tenthredopsis (Tenthredinidae: Hymenoptera), characterized by a Palearctic distribution, is widely recognized as a taxonomic challenge due to its limited morphological variation. This study aims to evaluate the phylogenetic and biogeographical characteristics of Tenthredopsis species in Anatolia by analyzing their morphological and molecular traits. Initially, morphotypes were defined based on morphological characters, and the taxonomic validity of each morphotype was assessed through phylogenetic analyses using three mitochondrial gene regions. The findings revealed congruence between morphological and molecular data. The study identified the distribution of 27 taxa within Anatolia, comprising 17 confirmed and 10 potential taxa, represented by 250 individuals belonging to the genus Tenthredopsis. The results underscore Anatolia's significance as a hotspot for genetic and morphological diversity within the genus Tenthredopsis and highlight its critical role in the evolutionary adaptations of these species. Additionally, the observed distribution patterns further support the importance of Anatolia as a refugium during the last glacial periods.

Supporting Institution

CUBAB F-170, Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Project Number

CUBAB F-170

Thanks

This study was supported by CUBAB F-170, Sivas Cumhuriyet University.

References

  • [1] Avise J.C., Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution. New York : Chapman and Hall, (1994) 511.
  • [2] Benson R.B., Hymenoptera from Turkey, Symphyta, Bulletion of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology, 22 (4) (1968) 109–207.
  • [3] Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P., Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87 (6) (1994) 651-701.
  • [4] Moritz C., Molecular Systematics (p. 3). D. M. Hillis, & B. K. Mable (Eds.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. (1990)
  • [5] Swofford D.L., PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (And Other Methods 4.ed. Massachusetts: Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, (2002) 294-307.
  • [6] Başıbüyük H.H., Bardakcı F., Belshaw R., and Quicke D.L.J, Phylogenetic Systematics: A concise practical guide, Sivas: Önder Matbaa, (2000) 134.
  • [7] Felsenstein J., Maximum likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees, Systematic Biology, 22 (3) (1973) 240-249.
  • [8] Königsmann E., Das Phylogenetische System der Hymenoptera. Teil 3: Terebrantes (Unterordnung Apocrita), Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrifit, 25 (1978a) 1–55.
  • [9] Königsmann E., Das Phylogenetische System der Hymenoptera. Teil 4: Aculeta (Unterordnung Apocrita), Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrifit, 25 (1978b) 365–465.
  • [10] Rasnitsyn A.P., An outline of evolution of the hymenopterous insects, Oriental Insects, 22 (1988) 115–145.
  • [11] Ronquist F., Rasnitsyn AP., Roy A., Eriksson K., Lindgren M., Phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: A cladistic reanalysis of Rasnitsyn’s (1988) data. Zoologica Scripta. 28 (1999) 13–50.
  • [12] Başıbüyük H.H., Quicke D.L.J, Morphology of the antenna cleaner in the Hymenoptera with particular reference to non-aculeata families (Insecta), Zoologica Scripta, 24(2) (1995) 157–177.
  • [13] Başıbüyük H.H., Quicke D.L.J, Hamuli in the Hymenoptera (Insecta) with their phylogenetic implications, Journal of Natural History, 31 (1997) 1563–1585.
  • [14] Başıbüyük H.H., Quicke D.L.J, Grooming behaviours in the Hymenoptera (Insecta): potential phylogenetic significance, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 125 (1999) 349–382.
  • [15] Gauld I.D, Bolton B., The Hymenoptera, British Museum (Natural History). New York: Oxford University Press, (1998) 322.
  • [16] Wolf F., Hyménoptères Symphytes de Turquie, Bulletin des Recerches agronomiques de Gembloux, 3 (1968) 562-565.
  • [17] [17] Chevin H., Chenon R., Contribution à la des Hymènoptères Symphytes de Turquie, Bulletin de la Sociètè entomologique de France, 87 (1982) 43-45.
  • [18] Zhelochovtsev A.N., Zinovjev A.G., A list of horntails (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) of the fauna of Russian and adjacent territories, II. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 74 (2) (1995) 395–415.
  • [19] Lacourt J., Répertoire des Tenthredinidae ouest-paléarctiques (Hymenoptera, Symphyta), Mém. Soc. ent. France, 3 (1999) 1-432.
  • [20]Çalmaşur Ö., Özbek H., A contribution to the knowledge of the Tenthredinidae (Symphyta, Hymenoptera) fauna of Turkey. Part I: The Subfamily Tenthredininae, Turkish Journal of Zoology, 28 (2004) 37–54.
  • [21] Blank S.M., and Ritzau C., Die Tenthredopsini Deutschlands (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). In: Taeger, A. & Blank, S. M. 1998 (Hrsg.), Pflanzenwespen Deutschlands (Hymenoptera, Symphyta). Kommentierte Bestandsaufnahme. Goecke & Evers, (1998) 227–246.
  • [22] Tarkhnishvili D., Thorpe R.S., Arntzen J.W, Pre-pleistocene refugia and differentiation between populations of the Caucasian salamender (Mertensiella caucasica), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 14 (2000) 414-422.
  • [23] Rokas A., Atkinson R.J., Webster L.M.I., Csokas G., Stone G.N., Out of Anatolia: longitudinal gradients in genetic diversity support an eastern origin for a circum-Mediterranean oak gallwasp Andricus quercustozae, Molecular Ecology, 12 (2003) 2153-2174.
  • [24] Çıplak B., Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of Anterastes (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Tettigoniinae): evolution within a refugium, Zoologica Scripta, 33 (2004) 19-44.

Tenthredopsis Türleri (Tenthredinidae: Symphyta: Hymenoptera) Genetik ve Morfolojik Çeşitliliği: Anadolu Örneği

Year 2025, Volume: 46 Issue: 2, 377 - 383, 30.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1608571

Abstract

Tenthredopsis cinsi (Tenthredinidae: Hymenoptera), Palearktik dağılımı ile karakterize edilen, sınırlı morfolojik varyasyonu nedeniyle taksonomik bir zorluk olarak geniş çapta tanınmaktadır. Bu çalışma, morfolojik ve moleküler özelliklerini analiz ederek Anadolu'daki Tenthredopsis türlerinin filogenetik ve biyocoğrafik özelliklerini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. İlk olarak, morfolojik karakterlere dayanarak morfotipler tanımlandı ve her morfotipin taksonomik geçerliliği, üç mitokondriyal gen bölgesi kullanılarak filogenetik analizler aracılığıyla değerlendirildi. Bulgular, morfolojik ve moleküler veriler arasında uyum olduğunu ortaya koydu. Çalışma, Anadolu'da 27 taksonun dağılımını belirledi; bunlar arasında 17 onaylanmış ve 10 potansiyel takson yer almakta olup, Tenthredopsis cinsine ait 250 bireyi temsil etmektedir. Sonuçlar, Anadolu'nun Tenthredopsis cinsi içinde genetik ve morfolojik çeşitlilik açısından bir sıcak nokta olarak önemini vurgulamaktadır ve bu türlerin evrimsel adaptasyonlarındaki kritik rolünü öne çıkarmaktadır. Ayrıca, gözlemlenen dağılım desenleri, Anadolu'nun son buzul dönemlerinde bir sığınak olarak önemini desteklemektedir.

Project Number

CUBAB F-170

References

  • [1] Avise J.C., Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution. New York : Chapman and Hall, (1994) 511.
  • [2] Benson R.B., Hymenoptera from Turkey, Symphyta, Bulletion of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology, 22 (4) (1968) 109–207.
  • [3] Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P., Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87 (6) (1994) 651-701.
  • [4] Moritz C., Molecular Systematics (p. 3). D. M. Hillis, & B. K. Mable (Eds.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. (1990)
  • [5] Swofford D.L., PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (And Other Methods 4.ed. Massachusetts: Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, (2002) 294-307.
  • [6] Başıbüyük H.H., Bardakcı F., Belshaw R., and Quicke D.L.J, Phylogenetic Systematics: A concise practical guide, Sivas: Önder Matbaa, (2000) 134.
  • [7] Felsenstein J., Maximum likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees, Systematic Biology, 22 (3) (1973) 240-249.
  • [8] Königsmann E., Das Phylogenetische System der Hymenoptera. Teil 3: Terebrantes (Unterordnung Apocrita), Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrifit, 25 (1978a) 1–55.
  • [9] Königsmann E., Das Phylogenetische System der Hymenoptera. Teil 4: Aculeta (Unterordnung Apocrita), Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrifit, 25 (1978b) 365–465.
  • [10] Rasnitsyn A.P., An outline of evolution of the hymenopterous insects, Oriental Insects, 22 (1988) 115–145.
  • [11] Ronquist F., Rasnitsyn AP., Roy A., Eriksson K., Lindgren M., Phylogeny of the Hymenoptera: A cladistic reanalysis of Rasnitsyn’s (1988) data. Zoologica Scripta. 28 (1999) 13–50.
  • [12] Başıbüyük H.H., Quicke D.L.J, Morphology of the antenna cleaner in the Hymenoptera with particular reference to non-aculeata families (Insecta), Zoologica Scripta, 24(2) (1995) 157–177.
  • [13] Başıbüyük H.H., Quicke D.L.J, Hamuli in the Hymenoptera (Insecta) with their phylogenetic implications, Journal of Natural History, 31 (1997) 1563–1585.
  • [14] Başıbüyük H.H., Quicke D.L.J, Grooming behaviours in the Hymenoptera (Insecta): potential phylogenetic significance, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 125 (1999) 349–382.
  • [15] Gauld I.D, Bolton B., The Hymenoptera, British Museum (Natural History). New York: Oxford University Press, (1998) 322.
  • [16] Wolf F., Hyménoptères Symphytes de Turquie, Bulletin des Recerches agronomiques de Gembloux, 3 (1968) 562-565.
  • [17] [17] Chevin H., Chenon R., Contribution à la des Hymènoptères Symphytes de Turquie, Bulletin de la Sociètè entomologique de France, 87 (1982) 43-45.
  • [18] Zhelochovtsev A.N., Zinovjev A.G., A list of horntails (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) of the fauna of Russian and adjacent territories, II. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 74 (2) (1995) 395–415.
  • [19] Lacourt J., Répertoire des Tenthredinidae ouest-paléarctiques (Hymenoptera, Symphyta), Mém. Soc. ent. France, 3 (1999) 1-432.
  • [20]Çalmaşur Ö., Özbek H., A contribution to the knowledge of the Tenthredinidae (Symphyta, Hymenoptera) fauna of Turkey. Part I: The Subfamily Tenthredininae, Turkish Journal of Zoology, 28 (2004) 37–54.
  • [21] Blank S.M., and Ritzau C., Die Tenthredopsini Deutschlands (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). In: Taeger, A. & Blank, S. M. 1998 (Hrsg.), Pflanzenwespen Deutschlands (Hymenoptera, Symphyta). Kommentierte Bestandsaufnahme. Goecke & Evers, (1998) 227–246.
  • [22] Tarkhnishvili D., Thorpe R.S., Arntzen J.W, Pre-pleistocene refugia and differentiation between populations of the Caucasian salamender (Mertensiella caucasica), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 14 (2000) 414-422.
  • [23] Rokas A., Atkinson R.J., Webster L.M.I., Csokas G., Stone G.N., Out of Anatolia: longitudinal gradients in genetic diversity support an eastern origin for a circum-Mediterranean oak gallwasp Andricus quercustozae, Molecular Ecology, 12 (2003) 2153-2174.
  • [24] Çıplak B., Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of Anterastes (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Tettigoniinae): evolution within a refugium, Zoologica Scripta, 33 (2004) 19-44.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Animal Systematics and Taxonomy, Molecular Genetics
Journal Section Natural Sciences
Authors

Sevda Hastaoğlu Örgen 0000-0001-8313-2946

Hasan Hüseyin Başıbüyük 0000-0001-6504-6139

Project Number CUBAB F-170
Publication Date June 30, 2025
Submission Date December 27, 2024
Acceptance Date May 7, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025Volume: 46 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Hastaoğlu Örgen, S., & Başıbüyük, H. H. (2025). Genetic and Morphological Diversity of Tenthredopsis (Tenthredinidae: Symphyta: Hymenoptera) Species: A Case Study in Anatolia. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 46(2), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1608571