Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A study on the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides and annual effective dose values in some tobacco samples

Year 2021, , 156 - 163, 29.03.2021
https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.659047

Abstract

Tobacco samples were collected from different tobacco markets from Antalya in Turkey. To calculate natural radionuclides activity concentration, samples were counted for 86400 seconds by using high purity germanium (HPGe) detector. Activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K for tobacco samples found higher than minimum detectable activity (MDA). 137Cs was not detected in any sample. Activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K range from 83±15 Bqkg-1 to 325±45 Bqkg-1, 29±5 Bqkg-1 to 207±37 Bqkg-1 and (2.09±0.28)x103 Bqkg-1 to (5.07±0.90) x103 Bqkg-1, respectively. In addition, annual effective dose value was calculated. The annual effective dose values owing to inhalation for adults change from 2.76 to 9.91 µSvy-1 for 214Pb, from 5.69 to 27.69 µSvy-1 for 214Bi, from 5.72 to 40.41 µSvy-1 for 228Ac, from 42.23 to 102.37 µSvy-1 for 40K. The total annual effective dose values change from 0.05 to 0.16 mSvy-1.

Thanks

M. Ishfaq wishes to acknowledge the support provided by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Department of Science Fellowships and Grant Programs (BIDEB) 2216 Research Fellowship Program for International Researchers (21514107-115.02-124287).

References

  • [1] UNSCEAR: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, New York: United Nations, (2000).
  • [2] UNSCEAR: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, New York: United Nations, (2016).
  • [3] Taskin H., Karavus M., Ay P., Topuzoglu A., Hidiroglu S., Karahan G., Radionuclide Concentrations in Soil and Lifetime Cancer Risk due to Gamma Radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 100 (2009) 49–53.
  • [4] Ridha A.A., Hasan A.H., Cancer Risk due to the Natural Radioactivity in Cigarette Tobacco, Detection, 4 (2016) 54-65.
  • [5] Savidou A., Kehagia K., Eleftheriadis K., Concentration Levels of 210Pb and 210Po in Dry Tobacco Leaves in Greece, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 85 (2006) 94-102.
  • [6] Jibiri N.N., Biere P.E., Activity Concentrations of 232Th, 226Ra and 40K and Gamma Radiation Absorbed Dose Rate Levels in Farm Soil for the Production of Different Brands of Cigarette Tobacco Smoked in Nigeria. Iran. J. Radiat. Res, 8 (4) (2011) 201-206.
  • [7] Abd El-Aziz N., Khater A.E.M., Al-Sewaidan H.A., Natural Radioactivity Contents in Tobacco. International Congress series, 1276 (2005) 407-408.
  • [8] Van Leeuwen F.E., Klokman W.J., Stovall M., Hagenbeek A., Van den Belt-Dusebout A.W., Noyon R., Boice J.D., Burgers J.M.V., Somers R. Roles of Radiotherapy and Smoking in Lung Cancer Following Hodgkin's Disease, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87(20) (1995) 1530–1537.
  • [9] Ozmen S.F., Boztosun I., Yavuz M., Tunc M.R. Determination of Gamma Radioactivity Levels and Associated Dose Rates of Soil Samples of the Akkuyu/Mersin Using High-Resolution Gamma-ray Spectrometry. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 158 (2014) 461– 465.
  • [10] Eke C., Boztosun I. Determination of Activity Concentration of Natural and Artificial Radionuclides in Sand Samples from Mediterranean Coast of Antalya in Turkey, Kerntechnik, 80 (3) (2015) 3 280– 290.
  • [11] Maestro-32: Multi-channel analyser software, A65- B32 model, Ortec (2008). Avaliable at: https://www.ortec-online.com/ /media/ametekortec/manuals/a65-mnl.pdf Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  • [12] Gamma-W. 2018. Avaliable at: http://www.westmeier.com/3gammawfeatures.hm Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  • [13] Currie L., Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination. J. Anal. Chem., 40 (1968) 586-593.
  • [14] Knoll G., Radiation detection and measurement. 3rd Edition, United States of America: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., (2000).
  • [15] Mohery M., Shadiah B., Kelany A.M., Abdallah A.M., Environmental Radiation Levels in Soil and Sediment Samples Collected from Floating Water from a Land Runway Resulting from Heavy Rains in the Jeddah Region, KSA. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 97 (2014) 16-24.
  • [16] ISO-GUM (International Organization for Standardization-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement). Avaliable at: https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/ Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  • [17] Beretka J.J., Mathew P., Natural Radioactivity of Australian Building Materials, İndustrial Wastes and by Products, Health Phys., 48 (1985) 87-95.
  • [18] Papastefanou C., Radioactivity of Tobacco Leaves and Radiation Dose Induced from Smoking, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 6 (2009) 558-567.
  • [19] ICRP, 2012. Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication 119. Ann. ICRP 41(Suppl.)
  • [20] Ravisankar R., Sivakumar S., Chandrasekaran A., Jebakumar P.P., J, Vijayalakshmi I., Vijayagopal P., Venkatraman B., Spatial distribution of gamma radioactivity levels and radiological hazard indices in the East Coastal Sediments of Tamilnadu, India with Statistical Approach, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 103 (2014) 89-98.
  • [21] NEA-OECD, Exposure to Radiation from Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials. Report by NEA Group of Experts of the Nuclear Energy Agency. OECD, Paris, France, (1979).
  • [22] Eke C., Comparison of Radioactivity Concentration of Potassium-40 Radionuclide in Tobacco Samples by using HPGe and NaI(Tl) Detectors, 6th ASM International Congress of Agriculture and Environment, 2018 Proceeding Book, 88-94.
  • [23] Abdul-Majid S., Kutbi I.I., Basabrain M., Radioactivity Levels in Jurak and Moasel, Comparison with Cigarette Tobacco, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 194 (2) (1995) 371– 377.
  • [24] Chauhan P., Chauhan R.P., Measurement of Fertilizers İnduced Radioactivity in Tobacco Plants and Elemental Analysis using ICAP-AES, Radiat. Meas., 63 (2014): 6-11.
  • [25] UNSCEAR: Report of the United Nations Scientific Comittee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. General Assembly, Thirteen session, Supplement No:17, New York, (1958).
  • [26] Farhan N., Studying the Natural Radioactivity in Some Tobacco Cigarettes Imported to Iraq from Unknown Origins, Jordan Med. J., 43 (2) (2009) 83-90.
  • [27] Mandic L.J., Dolic M., Markovic D., Todorovic D., Onjia A., Dragovic S., Natural Radionuclides in Cigarette Tobacco from Serbian Market and Effective Dose Estimate from Smoke İnhalation, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 168(1) (2016) 111–115.
  • [28] Papadopoulos A., Altunkaynak S., Koroneos A., Unal A., Kamaci O., Distribution of Natural Radioactivity and Assessment of Radioactive Dose of Western Anatolian Plutons, Turkey, Turkish J. Earth. Sci., 25 (2016) 434-455.

Bazı tütün örneklerinde doğal radyonüklitlerin aktivite konsantrasyonları ve yıllık etkin doz değerleri üzerine bir çalışma

Year 2021, , 156 - 163, 29.03.2021
https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.659047

Abstract

Tütün örnekleri farklı tütün satış yerlerinden temin edilmiştir. Doğal radyonüklitlerin aktivite konsantrasyonlarını belirlemek için her bir numune 86400 s yüksek saflıkta germanyum (HPGe) dedektörü kullanılarak sayılmıştır. Tütün örnekleri için 226Ra, 232Th ve 40K aktivite konsantrasyonları MDA'dan daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Herhangi bir numunede 137Cs dedekte edilmedi. 226Ra, 232Th and 40K için aktivite konsantrasyonları sırasıyla; 83±15 Bqkg-1ile 325±45 Bqkg-1, 29±5 Bqkg-1 ile 207±37 Bqkg-1 ve (2.09±0.38)x103 Bqkg-1 ile (5.07±0.90) x103 Bqkg-1 aralığındadır. Ek olarak, yıllık etkin doz değerleri hesaplandı. Yetişkinler için soluyarak içine çekmeden dolayı yıllık etkin doz değerleri 214Pb için 2.76 ile 9.91 µSvy-1 aralığında, 214Bi için 5.69 ile 27.69 µSvy-1 aralığında, 228Ac için 5.72 ile 40.41 µSvy-1 aralığında, 40K için 42.23 ile 102.37 µSvy-1 aralığında değişmektedir. Toplam yıllık etkin doz değerleri 0.05 ile 0.16 mSvy-1 aralığında değişmektedir.

References

  • [1] UNSCEAR: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, New York: United Nations, (2000).
  • [2] UNSCEAR: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, New York: United Nations, (2016).
  • [3] Taskin H., Karavus M., Ay P., Topuzoglu A., Hidiroglu S., Karahan G., Radionuclide Concentrations in Soil and Lifetime Cancer Risk due to Gamma Radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 100 (2009) 49–53.
  • [4] Ridha A.A., Hasan A.H., Cancer Risk due to the Natural Radioactivity in Cigarette Tobacco, Detection, 4 (2016) 54-65.
  • [5] Savidou A., Kehagia K., Eleftheriadis K., Concentration Levels of 210Pb and 210Po in Dry Tobacco Leaves in Greece, J. Environ. Radioactiv., 85 (2006) 94-102.
  • [6] Jibiri N.N., Biere P.E., Activity Concentrations of 232Th, 226Ra and 40K and Gamma Radiation Absorbed Dose Rate Levels in Farm Soil for the Production of Different Brands of Cigarette Tobacco Smoked in Nigeria. Iran. J. Radiat. Res, 8 (4) (2011) 201-206.
  • [7] Abd El-Aziz N., Khater A.E.M., Al-Sewaidan H.A., Natural Radioactivity Contents in Tobacco. International Congress series, 1276 (2005) 407-408.
  • [8] Van Leeuwen F.E., Klokman W.J., Stovall M., Hagenbeek A., Van den Belt-Dusebout A.W., Noyon R., Boice J.D., Burgers J.M.V., Somers R. Roles of Radiotherapy and Smoking in Lung Cancer Following Hodgkin's Disease, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87(20) (1995) 1530–1537.
  • [9] Ozmen S.F., Boztosun I., Yavuz M., Tunc M.R. Determination of Gamma Radioactivity Levels and Associated Dose Rates of Soil Samples of the Akkuyu/Mersin Using High-Resolution Gamma-ray Spectrometry. Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 158 (2014) 461– 465.
  • [10] Eke C., Boztosun I. Determination of Activity Concentration of Natural and Artificial Radionuclides in Sand Samples from Mediterranean Coast of Antalya in Turkey, Kerntechnik, 80 (3) (2015) 3 280– 290.
  • [11] Maestro-32: Multi-channel analyser software, A65- B32 model, Ortec (2008). Avaliable at: https://www.ortec-online.com/ /media/ametekortec/manuals/a65-mnl.pdf Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  • [12] Gamma-W. 2018. Avaliable at: http://www.westmeier.com/3gammawfeatures.hm Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  • [13] Currie L., Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination. J. Anal. Chem., 40 (1968) 586-593.
  • [14] Knoll G., Radiation detection and measurement. 3rd Edition, United States of America: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., (2000).
  • [15] Mohery M., Shadiah B., Kelany A.M., Abdallah A.M., Environmental Radiation Levels in Soil and Sediment Samples Collected from Floating Water from a Land Runway Resulting from Heavy Rains in the Jeddah Region, KSA. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 97 (2014) 16-24.
  • [16] ISO-GUM (International Organization for Standardization-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement). Avaliable at: https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/ Retrieved May 30, 2018.
  • [17] Beretka J.J., Mathew P., Natural Radioactivity of Australian Building Materials, İndustrial Wastes and by Products, Health Phys., 48 (1985) 87-95.
  • [18] Papastefanou C., Radioactivity of Tobacco Leaves and Radiation Dose Induced from Smoking, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 6 (2009) 558-567.
  • [19] ICRP, 2012. Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication 119. Ann. ICRP 41(Suppl.)
  • [20] Ravisankar R., Sivakumar S., Chandrasekaran A., Jebakumar P.P., J, Vijayalakshmi I., Vijayagopal P., Venkatraman B., Spatial distribution of gamma radioactivity levels and radiological hazard indices in the East Coastal Sediments of Tamilnadu, India with Statistical Approach, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 103 (2014) 89-98.
  • [21] NEA-OECD, Exposure to Radiation from Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials. Report by NEA Group of Experts of the Nuclear Energy Agency. OECD, Paris, France, (1979).
  • [22] Eke C., Comparison of Radioactivity Concentration of Potassium-40 Radionuclide in Tobacco Samples by using HPGe and NaI(Tl) Detectors, 6th ASM International Congress of Agriculture and Environment, 2018 Proceeding Book, 88-94.
  • [23] Abdul-Majid S., Kutbi I.I., Basabrain M., Radioactivity Levels in Jurak and Moasel, Comparison with Cigarette Tobacco, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 194 (2) (1995) 371– 377.
  • [24] Chauhan P., Chauhan R.P., Measurement of Fertilizers İnduced Radioactivity in Tobacco Plants and Elemental Analysis using ICAP-AES, Radiat. Meas., 63 (2014): 6-11.
  • [25] UNSCEAR: Report of the United Nations Scientific Comittee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. General Assembly, Thirteen session, Supplement No:17, New York, (1958).
  • [26] Farhan N., Studying the Natural Radioactivity in Some Tobacco Cigarettes Imported to Iraq from Unknown Origins, Jordan Med. J., 43 (2) (2009) 83-90.
  • [27] Mandic L.J., Dolic M., Markovic D., Todorovic D., Onjia A., Dragovic S., Natural Radionuclides in Cigarette Tobacco from Serbian Market and Effective Dose Estimate from Smoke İnhalation, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 168(1) (2016) 111–115.
  • [28] Papadopoulos A., Altunkaynak S., Koroneos A., Unal A., Kamaci O., Distribution of Natural Radioactivity and Assessment of Radioactive Dose of Western Anatolian Plutons, Turkey, Turkish J. Earth. Sci., 25 (2016) 434-455.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Natural Sciences
Authors

Canel Eke 0000-0002-6672-6467

Mavra Ishfaq 0000-0001-8700-0908

Publication Date March 29, 2021
Submission Date December 13, 2019
Acceptance Date December 3, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Eke, C., & Ishfaq, M. (2021). A study on the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides and annual effective dose values in some tobacco samples. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 42(1), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.659047