Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TARIM ARAZİLERİNİN ALIMINDA VEYA SATIMINDA ETKİLİ OLAN FAKTÖRLERİN KANONİK KORELASYON ANALİZİ İLE ETKİ BÜYÜKLÜĞÜNÜN BELİRLENMESİ.

Year 2023, , 411 - 417, 30.06.2023

İsmail Gök , Mustafa Şahin , Tolga Tolun

https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1139858

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı Kahramanmaraş ilinin Dulkadiroğlu ilçesindeki belirli mahallelerin tarım arazilerinin alım veya satımlarında etkili olan faktörlerde kanonik korelasyon yardımı ile oluşturulan veri setindeki etki eden faktörler arasındaki ilişkiyi ve diğerlerine nazaran en etkili olan faktör veya faktörleri belirlemektir. Bunun için belirlenen mahallelerdeki parsel sahipleriyle görüşülüp anket düzenlenmiştir ve 1000 kişilik veri seti oluşturulmuştur. Elde edilen veriler neticesinde kanonik korelasyon yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışmanın, tarım arazilerinin alım veya satımında etkili olan faktörler içinde arazinin eğim ve sulama durumu, arazinin ortalama verimlilik oranı ve arazide kullanılan traktör ve ekipmanları varlığı birinci veri seti olurken; arazi parsel büyüklüğü, arazi alış veya satış fiyatı ve hangi amaçla arazi alınıp veya satıldığı da ikinci veri seti olmuştur. Tahmin sonuçlarına göre oluşturulan veri setlerinde kanonik korelasyon katsayısı oranı %40,32 olarak bulunmuştur. Karşılaştırma yaptığımız veri setinde ise en yüksek etkiye sahip olan birinci veri setinde arazinin ortalama verimliliği iken, ikinci veri setinde de hangi amaçla arazi alınıp veya satıldığı olarak belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Tarım arazisi Faktör anket arazi alım-satımı

References

  • [1] Başer U., Determination of the factors affecting the land price in Lâdik district of Samsun province, Master's thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Science and Technology, 2015.
  • [2] Guide E., Agricultural valuation and expertise, Bursa, Third Edition, Ekin Publishing House, (2012).
  • [3] Çemrek F., Investigation of the Relationship Between Income and Welfare Level Variables of Provinces in Turkey with Canonical Correlation Analysis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 7 (2) (2012) 197-215.
  • [4] Özçomak MS., Demirci A., Investigation of the Relationship Between Social and Economic Indicators of African Union Countries by Canonical Correlation Analysis, Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 14 (1) (2010) 261-274.
  • [5] Sümbüloğlu K., Akdağ B., Advanced biostatistical methods, Hatipoğlu Publications, Ankara, (2009) 330.
  • [6] Albayrak S., Applied multivariate statistical techniques, Asil Publications Edition, Ankara, (2006) 500.
  • [7] Özçomak MS., Gündüz M., Demirci A., Yakut E., Investigation of the Relationship Between Various Climate and Crop Data with Canonical Correlation Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis Methods, Atatürk University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26 (1) (2012) 111-131.
  • [8] Albayrak S., Applied multivariate statistical techniques, Asil Publications Edition, Ankara, (2006) 500.
  • [9] Dillon WR., Goldstein M., Multivariate analysis methods and applications, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, (1984).
  • [10] Keskin S., Özsoy A.N., Canonical Correlation Analysis and an Application, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(1) (2004) 67-71.
  • [11] Çemrek F., Investigation of the Relationship Between Income and Welfare Level Variables of Provinces in Turkey with Canonical Correlation Analysis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 7 (2) (2012) 197-215.
  • [12] Kalaycı Ş., SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques, Asil Publications Edition, Ankara, (2006).
  • [13] Karagöz Y., SPSS Applied biostatistics-for medicine, pharmacy, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Nobel Publications Edition, 2nd ed. Ankara (2014) 760.
  • [14] Mr. A., Koğar H., Çakan M., Examination of Relationships Between Graded Courses with Canonical Correlation Technique: The Example of Classroom Teaching, Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3(1) (2012) 210- 220.
  • [15] Har J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C., Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (1998).
  • [16] Tatlıdil H., Applied multivariate statistical methods, Cem Web Ofset, Ankara, (1996).
  • [17] Oktay E., Kaynak S., Investigation of Canonical Relationship Between Information Economy Input and Output Variables of Turkey and European Union Countries, Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 2(10) (2007) 419-440.
  • [18] Özçomak M.S., Gündüz M., Demirci A., Yakut E., Investigation of the Relationship Between Various Climate and Crop Data with Canonical Correlation Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis Methods, Atatürk University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26 (1) (2012) 111-131.
  • [19] Karagöz Y., SPSS Applied biostatistics-for medicine, pharmacy, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Nobel Publications Edition, 2nd ed. Ankara (2014) 760.
  • [20] Açıl A.F., The values of various agricultural land types in Turkey between 1950-1974 and their changes, Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, (1976) 619.
  • [21] Chicoine D.L., Farmland Values at the Urban Fringe, an Analysis of Sale Prices, Land Econ, 57(3) (1981) 353 -362.
  • [22] First A., A Research on the Factors Affecting the Values of Field Lands in Erzurum and Erzincan Provinces, PhD Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Science, 1997.
  • [23] Öztürk K.C., Engindeniz S., Hedonic Analysis of Agricultural Land Values: The Example of Menemen District of İzmir, Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 50(3) (2013) 241-250.
  • [24] Başer U., Kılıç O., Determination of factors affecting land price, Samsun Province Lâdik District Example, Turkey XII. National Agricultural Economics Congress, 25-27 May, (2016) 273-280, Isparta, Turkey.
  • [25] Karaca D., İbraimi S., Engindeniz S., Akyüz Y., Çınar G., Analysis of Factors Affecting the Land Purchase-Sale Decisions of Producers in Rural Areas: The Example of Kemalpaşa District of İzmir, Journal of Ege University Faculty of Agriculture, 53(4) (2016) 481-489 .
  • [26] Engindeniz S., Bayraktar Ö., Örük G., Analysis of Factors Affecting the Value of Irrigable Agricultural Lands in İzmir: İzmir Case, Selçuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 31(3) (2017) 75-87.
  • [27] Çınar G., Altınok A.C., Özcan H., Aslan F., Estimation of factors affecting agricultural land value in Aydın province with hedonic pricing model, Ahtamara I. International Multidisciplinary Studies Congress, 25-26 August, (2018) Van, Turkey.
  • [28] Başer U., Kılıç O., Abacı H., Determination of Direct and Indirect Effects of Factors Affecting Land Price by Path Analysis, Samsun Province Lâdik District Example, Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(1) (2019) 50-56.

Determination of Impact Size by Canonic Correlation Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Buying or Selling Agricultural Lands

Year 2023, , 411 - 417, 30.06.2023

İsmail Gök , Mustafa Şahin , Tolga Tolun

https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1139858

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the influencing factors in the data set created with the help of canonical correlation in the factors affecting the purchase or sale of agricultural lands in certain neighborhoods in the Dulkadiroğlu district of Kahramanmaraş province and the most effective factor or factors compared to the others. For this, a survey was conducted with the parcel owners in the determined neighborhoods and a data set of 1000 people was created. As a result of the data obtained, the first data set of the study, in which the canonical correlation method was used, was the slope and irrigation status of the land, the average productivity rate of the land, and the presence of tractors and equipment used in the land, among the factors affecting the purchase or sale of agricultural lands; land parcel size, land purchase or sale price and for what purpose the land was bought or sold were also the second data set. The rate of canonical correlation coefficient in the data sets created according to the estimation results was found to be 40.32%. In the data set we compared, the average productivity of the land was determined in the first data set with the highest effect, while in the second data set it was determined as the purpose for which the land was bought or sold

Keywords

Agricultural land Factor Survey and Land trading

References

  • [1] Başer U., Determination of the factors affecting the land price in Lâdik district of Samsun province, Master's thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Science and Technology, 2015.
  • [2] Guide E., Agricultural valuation and expertise, Bursa, Third Edition, Ekin Publishing House, (2012).
  • [3] Çemrek F., Investigation of the Relationship Between Income and Welfare Level Variables of Provinces in Turkey with Canonical Correlation Analysis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 7 (2) (2012) 197-215.
  • [4] Özçomak MS., Demirci A., Investigation of the Relationship Between Social and Economic Indicators of African Union Countries by Canonical Correlation Analysis, Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 14 (1) (2010) 261-274.
  • [5] Sümbüloğlu K., Akdağ B., Advanced biostatistical methods, Hatipoğlu Publications, Ankara, (2009) 330.
  • [6] Albayrak S., Applied multivariate statistical techniques, Asil Publications Edition, Ankara, (2006) 500.
  • [7] Özçomak MS., Gündüz M., Demirci A., Yakut E., Investigation of the Relationship Between Various Climate and Crop Data with Canonical Correlation Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis Methods, Atatürk University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26 (1) (2012) 111-131.
  • [8] Albayrak S., Applied multivariate statistical techniques, Asil Publications Edition, Ankara, (2006) 500.
  • [9] Dillon WR., Goldstein M., Multivariate analysis methods and applications, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, (1984).
  • [10] Keskin S., Özsoy A.N., Canonical Correlation Analysis and an Application, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(1) (2004) 67-71.
  • [11] Çemrek F., Investigation of the Relationship Between Income and Welfare Level Variables of Provinces in Turkey with Canonical Correlation Analysis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 7 (2) (2012) 197-215.
  • [12] Kalaycı Ş., SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques, Asil Publications Edition, Ankara, (2006).
  • [13] Karagöz Y., SPSS Applied biostatistics-for medicine, pharmacy, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Nobel Publications Edition, 2nd ed. Ankara (2014) 760.
  • [14] Mr. A., Koğar H., Çakan M., Examination of Relationships Between Graded Courses with Canonical Correlation Technique: The Example of Classroom Teaching, Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3(1) (2012) 210- 220.
  • [15] Har J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C., Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (1998).
  • [16] Tatlıdil H., Applied multivariate statistical methods, Cem Web Ofset, Ankara, (1996).
  • [17] Oktay E., Kaynak S., Investigation of Canonical Relationship Between Information Economy Input and Output Variables of Turkey and European Union Countries, Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 2(10) (2007) 419-440.
  • [18] Özçomak M.S., Gündüz M., Demirci A., Yakut E., Investigation of the Relationship Between Various Climate and Crop Data with Canonical Correlation Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis Methods, Atatürk University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26 (1) (2012) 111-131.
  • [19] Karagöz Y., SPSS Applied biostatistics-for medicine, pharmacy, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Nobel Publications Edition, 2nd ed. Ankara (2014) 760.
  • [20] Açıl A.F., The values of various agricultural land types in Turkey between 1950-1974 and their changes, Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, (1976) 619.
  • [21] Chicoine D.L., Farmland Values at the Urban Fringe, an Analysis of Sale Prices, Land Econ, 57(3) (1981) 353 -362.
  • [22] First A., A Research on the Factors Affecting the Values of Field Lands in Erzurum and Erzincan Provinces, PhD Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Science, 1997.
  • [23] Öztürk K.C., Engindeniz S., Hedonic Analysis of Agricultural Land Values: The Example of Menemen District of İzmir, Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 50(3) (2013) 241-250.
  • [24] Başer U., Kılıç O., Determination of factors affecting land price, Samsun Province Lâdik District Example, Turkey XII. National Agricultural Economics Congress, 25-27 May, (2016) 273-280, Isparta, Turkey.
  • [25] Karaca D., İbraimi S., Engindeniz S., Akyüz Y., Çınar G., Analysis of Factors Affecting the Land Purchase-Sale Decisions of Producers in Rural Areas: The Example of Kemalpaşa District of İzmir, Journal of Ege University Faculty of Agriculture, 53(4) (2016) 481-489 .
  • [26] Engindeniz S., Bayraktar Ö., Örük G., Analysis of Factors Affecting the Value of Irrigable Agricultural Lands in İzmir: İzmir Case, Selçuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 31(3) (2017) 75-87.
  • [27] Çınar G., Altınok A.C., Özcan H., Aslan F., Estimation of factors affecting agricultural land value in Aydın province with hedonic pricing model, Ahtamara I. International Multidisciplinary Studies Congress, 25-26 August, (2018) Van, Turkey.
  • [28] Başer U., Kılıç O., Abacı H., Determination of Direct and Indirect Effects of Factors Affecting Land Price by Path Analysis, Samsun Province Lâdik District Example, Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(1) (2019) 50-56.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Statistics
Journal Section Natural Sciences
Authors

İsmail Gök 0000-0002-0759-1187

Mustafa Şahin 0000-0003-3622-4543

Tolga Tolun 0000-0003-4081-1222

Publication Date June 30, 2023
Submission Date July 2, 2022
Acceptance Date June 12, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Gök, İ., Şahin, M., & Tolun, T. (2023). Determination of Impact Size by Canonic Correlation Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Buying or Selling Agricultural Lands. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 44(2), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1139858