EN
Comparison of tul4, fopA, 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from Sivas, Turkey
Abstract
Tularemia is a zoonotic disease that can infect animals and people. It is known that tularemia outbreaks in Turkey is water-borne and causative agent F. tularensis subsp. holarctica. Eight F. tularensis were isolated from the water samples in tularemia outbreaks observed in Sivas during 2011-2013. In this study; tul4, fopA, RD1 and 16S rRNA gene regions of eight F. tularensis isolates were amplified by PCR method and investigated by sequencing method. Sequence analysis of the gene regions were compared with each other and the samples found in GenBank. All samples were found to be similar in terms of the partial sequence of the tul4 and fopA gene region. In terms of 16S rRNA gene region, Belkent2012 and Belkent2013 isolates and Çiçekoğlu and Döllük isolates were detected similar among themselves. Bahçeiçi and Karaören isolates were found similar at RD1 gene regions. In the sequence comparison of GenBank in terms of examined gene regions, 94-100% similarity was determined with F. tularensis subsp. holarctica LVS and F. tularensis subsp. holarctica PHIT-FT049. As a result of our study; the tul4 and fopA gene regions of eight F. tularensis subsp. holarctica isolates were found to have identical and different base sequence origins in 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions in tularemia outbreaks in Sivas. In order to reveal the phylogeography of F. tularensis’ in Turkey, it is necessary to produce new isolates from epidemic regions and to investigate them with advanced molecular techniques.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund of Sivas Cumhuriyet University (CÜBAP) under the project number ECZ-054.
Project Number
ECZ-054
Thanks
We would lik to thank Dr. Bekir Çelebi (Public Health Institution of Turkey, National Tularemia Reference Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey) for the F. tularensis subsp. holarctica LVS strain (NCTC 10857).
References
- [1] Ellis J., Oyston P.C., Green M., Titball R.W., Tularemia, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 15(4) (2002) 631-646.
- [2] WHO, WHO Guidelines on Tularemia, France : World Health Organization, (2007) WHO/CDS/EPR/2007.7.
- [3] Fey P.D., Dempsey M.M., Olson M.E., Chrustowski M.S., Engle J.L., Jay J.J., Dobson M.E., Kalasinsky K.S., Shea A.A., Iwen P.C., Wickert R.C., Francesconi S.C., Crawford R.M., Hinrichs S.H., Molecular analysis of Francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis and holarctica, Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 128(6) (2007) 926-935.
- [4] Sjöstedt A., Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology and clinical manifestations, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1105 (2007) 1-29.
- [5] Jackson J., McGregor A., Cooley L., Ng J., Brown M., Ong C.W., Darcy C., Sintchenko V., Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica, Tasmania, Australia 2011, Emerg. Infect. Dis., 18(9) (2012) 1484-1486.
- [6] Hennebique A., Boisset S., Maurin M., Tularemia as a waterborne disease: a review, Emerg. Microbes Infect., 8(1) (2019) 1027-1042.
- [7] Kilic S., Birdsell D.N., Karagöz A., Çelebi B., Bakkaloglu Z., Arikan M., Sahl J.W., Mitchell C., Rivera A., Maltinsky S., Keim P., Üstek D., Durmaz R., Wagner D.M., Water as source of Francisella tularensis infection in humans, Turkey, Emerg. Infect. Dis., 21(12) (2015) 2213–2216.
- [8] Kılıç S., A General Overview of Francisella tularensis and the Epidemiology of Tularemia in Turkey, Flora., 15(2) (2010) 37-58.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Structural Biology
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
March 29, 2021
Submission Date
December 18, 2020
Acceptance Date
March 8, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 42 Number: 1
APA
Demir, S., & Ataş, M. (2021). Comparison of tul4, fopA, 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from Sivas, Turkey. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 42(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.842900
AMA
1.Demir S, Ataş M. Comparison of tul4, fopA, 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from Sivas, Turkey. CSJ. 2021;42(1):7-12. doi:10.17776/csj.842900
Chicago
Demir, Sinem, and Mehmet Ataş. 2021. “Comparison of Tul4, FopA, 16S RRNA and RD1 Gene Regions of Francisella Tularensis Strains Isolated from Sivas, Turkey”. Cumhuriyet Science Journal 42 (1): 7-12. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.842900.
EndNote
Demir S, Ataş M (March 1, 2021) Comparison of tul4, fopA, 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from Sivas, Turkey. Cumhuriyet Science Journal 42 1 7–12.
IEEE
[1]S. Demir and M. Ataş, “Comparison of tul4, fopA, 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from Sivas, Turkey”, CSJ, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 7–12, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.17776/csj.842900.
ISNAD
Demir, Sinem - Ataş, Mehmet. “Comparison of Tul4, FopA, 16S RRNA and RD1 Gene Regions of Francisella Tularensis Strains Isolated from Sivas, Turkey”. Cumhuriyet Science Journal 42/1 (March 1, 2021): 7-12. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.842900.
JAMA
1.Demir S, Ataş M. Comparison of tul4, fopA, 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from Sivas, Turkey. CSJ. 2021;42:7–12.
MLA
Demir, Sinem, and Mehmet Ataş. “Comparison of Tul4, FopA, 16S RRNA and RD1 Gene Regions of Francisella Tularensis Strains Isolated from Sivas, Turkey”. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, Mar. 2021, pp. 7-12, doi:10.17776/csj.842900.
Vancouver
1.Sinem Demir, Mehmet Ataş. Comparison of tul4, fopA, 16S rRNA and RD1 gene regions of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from Sivas, Turkey. CSJ. 2021 Mar. 1;42(1):7-12. doi:10.17776/csj.842900