Sensitive Determination of Gemcitabine Molecule by Novel Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction Coupled with HPLC-DAD
Abstract
Gemcitabine (GEM) is a widely employed antimetabolite with broad antineoplastic properties and is commonly administered in the treatment of pancreatic, breast, and ovarian cancers. In this study, a new sample preparation and quantification strategy was established to enable the trace-level determination of GEM. The approach integrates magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) with subsequent HPLC–DAD analysis. Within the method, GEM is initially retained on a magnetic sorbent in a pH 5.0 buffer medium, followed by desorption into a reduced volume of ethanol to facilitate chromatographic measurement. Key experimental parameters particularly adsorption and desorption conditions as well as medium pH were systematically examined and optimized. Analytical performance characteristics, including the linear working range, enrichment factor, limit of detection, accuracy, and repeatability, were assessed using model solutions. Chromatographic detection of GEM was achieved at 277 nm under isocratic conditions composed of 60 % methanol, 25 % phosphate buffer at pH 6.0, and 15 % acetonitrile. Partial validation with model solutions demonstrated a detection limit of 3.43 ng mL⁻¹ and an enrichment factor of 100. Overall, the developed method offers high sensitivity, strong reproducibility, and reliable applicability for monitoring GEM at trace concentration levels.
Keywords
References
- [1] Rath O., Kozielski F., Kinesins and Cancer, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 12 (2012) 527–539.
- [2] Xiao M., Li X., Zhang X., Duan X., Lin H., Liu S., Sui G., Assessment of Cancer-Related Signaling Pathways in Responses to Polystyrene Nanoplastics via a Kidney-Testis Microfluidic Platform (KTP), Sci. Total Environ., 857 (2023) 159306.
- [3] Pantel K., Alix-Panabières C., Riethdorf S., Cancer Micrometastases, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 6 (2009) 339–351.
- [4] Nygren P., What is Cancer Chemotherapy? Acta Oncol. (Madr.), 40 (2001) 166–174.
- [5] Olin J. L., St. Pierre M., Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Prevention, Ann. Pharmacother., 48 (2014) 1605–1610.
- [6] Alping P., Askling J., Burman J., Fink K., Fogdell-Hahn A., Gunnarsson M., Hillert J., Langer-Gould A., Lycke J., Nilsson P., Salzer J., Svenningsson A., Vrethem M., Olsson T., Piehl F., Frisell T., Cancer Risk for Fingolimod, Natalizumab, and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis Patients, Ann. Neurol., 87 (2020) 688–699.
- [7] Borrie A. E., Rose F. A., Choi Y. H., Perera F. E., Read N., Sexton T., Lock M., Vandenberg T. A., Hahn K., Younus J., Logan D., Potvin K., Yaremko B., Yu E., Lenehan J., Welch S., Teft W. A., Kim R. B., Genetic and Clinical Predictors of Arthralgia During Letrozole or Anastrozole Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients, Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 183 (2020) 365–372.
- [8] Nabholtz J. M., Mouret-Reynier M. A., Durando X., Van Praagh I., Al-Sukhun S., Ferriere J. P., Chollet P., Comparative Review of Anastrozole, Letrozole and Exemestane in the Management of Early Breast Cancer, Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 10 (2009) 1435–1447.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 30, 2025
Submission Date
September 19, 2025
Acceptance Date
November 29, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 46 Number: 4