Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Çevresel Faktörlerin Parmak İzi Gelişimine Etkileri

Year 2021, Issue: 32, 463 - 470, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1039397

Abstract

Parmak izleri kişilere özeldir ve olay yeri incelemelerinde önemli bir rol oynar. Günümüzde tam olarak görülemeyen veya yeterli özelliklere sahip olmayan parmak izlerinin tespit edilmesi için en iyi yöntemlerin geliştirilmesi arayışları devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, materyal olarak onam formunu imzalayan 24-50 yaş arası, iki kadın ve iki erkek olmak üzere dört kişiden örnek olarak 2448 parmak izi kullanılmıştır. Laboratuvarda parmak izi geliştirmek için gözenekli ve gözeneksiz malzemeler kullanıldı. Gözeneksiz malzeme olarak cam, metal ve plastik malzemeler kullanılmıştır. Gözeneksiz malzemeler için siyanoakrilat buharı ve boyama yöntemleri kullanıldı. Kağıt ve ham ahşap gibi gözenekli malzemeler için iyot buharı, ninhidrin ve gümüş nitrat kullanılmıştır. Her numune için yüksek kaliteli fotoğraflar çekilerek görüntü netleştirme yapılmıştır. Böylece parmak izleri tespit edilmiş oldu. Sınıflandırılabilen ve sınıflandırılamayan parmak izleri başarılı bir şekilde karşılaştırılmış ve verileri hesaplanmıştır. Deneysel sonuçlar, failin gizli parmak izlerinin tespit edilmesinde olayın aydınlatılmasında yüzey tiplerinin son derece önemli olduğunu göstermiştir.

References

  • Britain, G. (1988). Manual of fingerprint development techniques: a guide to the selection and use of processes for the development of latent fingerprints. Home Office, Scientific Research and Development Branch.
  • Bowman, V. (2009). Manual of Fingerprint Development Techniques, 3rd rev. Home Office, Police Scientific Development Branch: Sandridge, UK.
  • Barnum, C., & Klasey, D. (1997). Factors affecting the recovery of latent prints on firearms. Journal of Forensic Identification, 47, 141-149.
  • Neumann, C. (2012). Fingerprints at the crime‐scene: Statistically certain, or probable?. Significance, 9(1), 21-25.
  • Ramotowski, R. (Ed.). (2012). Lee and Gaensslen's advances in fingerprint technology. CRC press.
  • Gardner, R. M., & Krouskup, D. (2018). Practical crime scene processing and investigation. CRC Press.
  • Upadhyay, S., & Yadav, B. (2019). Latent Fingerprint on Human Skin: A Silent Diagnosis. J Forensic Sci Criminol, 7(2), 205.
  • Daluz, H. M. (2018). Fingerprint analysis laboratory workbook. CRC Press.
  • Hazen, R. J. (1980). A Review of Scott's Fingerprint Mechanics. Journal of Forensic Science, 25(2), 450-450.
  • Bleay, S. M., Croxton, R. S., & De Puit, M. (2018). Fingerprint development techniques: theory and application.
  • Amata, B., Aprea, G. M., Chiuri, A., & Zampa, F. (2015). Fingerprint on trigger: a real case. Forensic science international, 253, e25-e27.
  • Schwarz, L., & Hermanowski, M. L. (2012). The Effect of Humidity on Long-Term Storage of Evidence Prior to Using
  • Cyanoacrylate Fuming for the Detection of Latent Fingerprints. Journal of Forensic Identification, 62(3).
  • Deans, J. (2006). Recovery of fingerprints from fire scenes and associated evidence. Science & justice: journal of the Forensic Science Society, 46(3), 153-168.
  • Balogh, M. K., Burger, J., Bender, K., Schneider, P. M., & Alt, K. W. (2003). STR genotyping and mtDNA sequencing of latent fingerprint on paper. Forensic science international, 137(2-3), 188-195.
  • Trapecar, M., & Balazic, J. (2007). Fingerprint recovery from human skin surfaces. Science & Justice, 47(3), 136-140.
  • Khadri, S. Y., Goudar, E. S., & Khadri, S. Y. (2013). A study of fingerprint pattern and gender distribution of fingerprint in and around Bijapur. Al Ameen J Med Sci, 6(4), 328-331.

Effects of Environmental Factors on Fingerprint Development

Year 2021, Issue: 32, 463 - 470, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1039397

Abstract

Fingerprints are unique to individuals and play an important role in the investigations at the crime scene. Today searches for developing the best methods to detect the fingerprints that are not completely visible or not have sufficient characteristics are still ongoing. In this study, 2448 fingerprints were used as samples collected from four individuals, between 24-50 years old, two women and two men, who signed the consent form as material. Porous and nonporous materials were used to develop fingerprints in the laboratory. Glass, metal, and plastic materials were used as nonporous materials. Cyanoacrylate vapor and staining methods were used for non-porous materials. Iodine vapor, ninhydrin, and silver nitrate were used for porous materials such as paper and raw wood. Image sharpening was performed by taking high-quality photographs for each sample. Thus, fingerprints were identified. Fingerprints that can and cannot be classified were successfully compared and their data were calculated. The experimental results showed that surface types are extremely important in the elucidation of the event in detecting hidden fingerprints of the perpetrator.

References

  • Britain, G. (1988). Manual of fingerprint development techniques: a guide to the selection and use of processes for the development of latent fingerprints. Home Office, Scientific Research and Development Branch.
  • Bowman, V. (2009). Manual of Fingerprint Development Techniques, 3rd rev. Home Office, Police Scientific Development Branch: Sandridge, UK.
  • Barnum, C., & Klasey, D. (1997). Factors affecting the recovery of latent prints on firearms. Journal of Forensic Identification, 47, 141-149.
  • Neumann, C. (2012). Fingerprints at the crime‐scene: Statistically certain, or probable?. Significance, 9(1), 21-25.
  • Ramotowski, R. (Ed.). (2012). Lee and Gaensslen's advances in fingerprint technology. CRC press.
  • Gardner, R. M., & Krouskup, D. (2018). Practical crime scene processing and investigation. CRC Press.
  • Upadhyay, S., & Yadav, B. (2019). Latent Fingerprint on Human Skin: A Silent Diagnosis. J Forensic Sci Criminol, 7(2), 205.
  • Daluz, H. M. (2018). Fingerprint analysis laboratory workbook. CRC Press.
  • Hazen, R. J. (1980). A Review of Scott's Fingerprint Mechanics. Journal of Forensic Science, 25(2), 450-450.
  • Bleay, S. M., Croxton, R. S., & De Puit, M. (2018). Fingerprint development techniques: theory and application.
  • Amata, B., Aprea, G. M., Chiuri, A., & Zampa, F. (2015). Fingerprint on trigger: a real case. Forensic science international, 253, e25-e27.
  • Schwarz, L., & Hermanowski, M. L. (2012). The Effect of Humidity on Long-Term Storage of Evidence Prior to Using
  • Cyanoacrylate Fuming for the Detection of Latent Fingerprints. Journal of Forensic Identification, 62(3).
  • Deans, J. (2006). Recovery of fingerprints from fire scenes and associated evidence. Science & justice: journal of the Forensic Science Society, 46(3), 153-168.
  • Balogh, M. K., Burger, J., Bender, K., Schneider, P. M., & Alt, K. W. (2003). STR genotyping and mtDNA sequencing of latent fingerprint on paper. Forensic science international, 137(2-3), 188-195.
  • Trapecar, M., & Balazic, J. (2007). Fingerprint recovery from human skin surfaces. Science & Justice, 47(3), 136-140.
  • Khadri, S. Y., Goudar, E. S., & Khadri, S. Y. (2013). A study of fingerprint pattern and gender distribution of fingerprint in and around Bijapur. Al Ameen J Med Sci, 6(4), 328-331.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Yakup Gülekçi 0000-0001-9643-6850

Publication Date December 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 32

Cite

APA Gülekçi, Y. (2021). Effects of Environmental Factors on Fingerprint Development. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi(32), 463-470. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1039397